Ad Security Reviewer vs Functional Reviewer
Compare these two Claude Code sub-agents to find the best fit for your project. Both are in the Quality & Security category.
Comparison Overview
Ad Security Reviewer
Active Directory security specialist analyzing identity configuration, privileged group design, delegation, authentication policies, legacy protocols, and attack-surface exposure across enterprise domains. Use when reviewing Active Directory security configurations.
View Full PromptFunctional Reviewer
Senior QA analyst that compares code diffs against acceptance criteria to find functional gaps, regression risks, and missing edge cases. Use when you have a diff and AC to compare. Part of the qa-orchestra QA lifecycle toolkit.
View Full PromptTool Comparison
Shared Tools (4)
Only in Ad Security Reviewer (2)
Only in Functional Reviewer (0)
No unique tools
When to Use Each
Use Ad Security Reviewer when:
- • You need expertise in Read, Write, Edit
- • Your project aligns with Quality & Security
- • You prefer more comprehensive tool coverage
Use Functional Reviewer when:
- • You need expertise in Read, Glob, Grep
- • Your project aligns with Quality & Security
- • You prefer focused tool coverage
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between Ad Security Reviewer and Functional Reviewer?
Ad Security Reviewer and Functional Reviewer are both Claude Code sub-agents, but they're optimized for different use cases. Ad Security Reviewer focuses on Active Directory security specialist analyzing identity configuration, privileged group design, delegation, authentication policies, legacy protocols, and attack-surface exposure across enterprise domains. Use when reviewing Active Directory security configurations., while Functional Reviewer is better suited for Senior QA analyst that compares code diffs against acceptance criteria to find functional gaps, regression risks, and missing edge cases. Use when you have a diff and AC to compare. Part of the qa-orchestra QA lifecycle toolkit..
Which sub-agent should I use: Ad Security Reviewer or Functional Reviewer?
The best choice depends on your specific needs. Use Ad Security Reviewer when you need Active Directory security specialist analyzing identity configuration, privileged group design, delegation, authentication policies, legacy protocols, and attack-surface exposure across enterprise domains. Use when reviewing Active Directory security configurations.. Choose Functional Reviewer when your work requires Senior QA analyst that compares code diffs against acceptance criteria to find functional gaps, regression risks, and missing edge cases. Use when you have a diff and AC to compare. Part of the qa-orchestra QA lifecycle toolkit..
Can I use both Ad Security Reviewer and Functional Reviewer together?
Yes! You can combine multiple sub-agents by including their prompts in your CLAUDE.md file. Many developers use different agents for different parts of their workflow or project.